Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 5 results ...

Ariffin, M H and Jaafar, N (2007) Entry participation motivations in co-curricular activities: the case of construction management students at a Malaysian university. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 3(01), 17–34.

Choi, S D (2007) Opportunities for improving productivity in roofing construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 3(01), 67–77.

Grosskopf, K R, Celik, B, Song, C and Oppenheim, P (2007) QA/QC software to mitigate mould and other indoor air quality (IAQ) hazards in construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 3(01), 35–50.

Rizk, T and Fouad, N (2007) Alternative project delivery systems for public transportation projects. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 3(01), 51–65.

Williamson III, K C and Burt, R A (2007) The ranking of C-schools using the criteria of ASC publication. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 3(01), 3–16.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: C-schools; profiling; publications; ranking
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1557-8771
  • URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1557-8771&volume=3&issue=1&spage=3
  • Abstract:
    This research profiles, measures and ranks Associate Schools of Construction (ASC) publications as one way to create a system that would affect a C-school top-ranking solution. Past attempts highlight a peer-group evaluation process that is fraught with conflict between academic construction programs. This new methodology introduces a categorical ranking system that is end-user responsive. Although there are three potential end users of the ranking system (i.e., students, programs, and employers), these criteria will assist mainly the programs in cross C-school evaluation. The results provide two levels of rankings, 1) long-term and 2) current, calculated to affect selected equity weights that negate program size.